RFS President in big interview: "There was a fear that there would be zero goals in the Europa League"
https://sportacentrs.com/futbols/virsli ... vasara_bij
iškarpos
"I could be wrong by a million. Yes, it sounds silly to say that, but we really haven't put the whole season together yet"
"What Verpakovskis said in an interview that, despite the Eurocup bonus of about five million, we will end the year with zeros, is true," said Milovs. "Why is that? First, our budget has grown significantly in two years. Second, this year we will pay out quite large bonuses. Yes, I can say approximately - I think they will be worth 1-1.2 million euros. The leading players will receive around 50-60 thousand, roughly speaking. So, out of these five Euro Cup millions, one will already go to bonuses."
"Then, don't forget that there are 4-5 flights with hotels, and each is worth 60-100 thousand. There will also be a camp in Spain, where we will be 10 days before the game against Maccabi. Such things add up, and when you add them up, the net income from UEFA is much lower than it looks," Milovs explained.
"There are also salaries, infrastructure, other expenses, and then in the end it really comes down to that - zeros in the budget. Maybe a couple more transfers will come, then maybe there will be a season with a plus sign financially. I'm telling you all this from memory and I could be wrong by a million. Yes, it sounds silly to say that - "wrong by a million". But we simply haven't had the moment yet when we sit down and add up all the pluses and minuses in the overall balance sheet. There will also be some income from points in the Europa League games, but we will also pay bonuses to the team from them. For example, we also paid bonuses for the Latvian Cup, although the Latvian Cup essentially gave us nothing. Yes, there is one more title in the club's description, but it doesn't change anything in our bank account."
"Another thing is income from ticket sales. This is the first season we've worked so seriously with it. I don't know all the details there either, just the general picture. Maybe when all the numbers are compiled, there will be a positive surprise that we've earned more than we expected. So Māris's answer about us having zero budget is true. He also does those interviews much better than I do," the RFS president smiled. "In addition, as the club's general director, Māris is much more directly involved in all the club's costs and money matters. I might look at something there once a month or two to see how it looks overall, but he works with it all the time."
On "Riga"'s big budget and still being left without a title
"The difference in budgets between "Riga" and the others is, of course, quite large. I've thought about it a lot," admitted RFS President Artjoms Milovs. "Here you need to understand that for the first million you can create the foundations of a team and a good team can be assembled, with which you can already fight for something. With the second million you can already guarantee yourself the European Cups, of course, with exceptional cases. If you already have a budget of four million, then you already need to fight for the title. Namely, the idea is that with each next million invested or each next 100 thousand your chances of becoming a champion increase, this probability becomes greater, but with each next million this increase becomes smaller and smaller."
"I would even say that there comes a limit where this probability no longer increases, maybe even decreases. For example, a budget of seven million - if you go beyond that, then your players may already be too good for this level, their level is higher than necessary, and they may lose motivation to play here. Therefore, I would say that in Latvian football there is such a golden number, a golden mean, with which to build a club's budget. Compared to "Riga", yes, we have a smaller budget, but does that larger budget still provide any additional contribution? Yes, there is no doubt about one thing - if you do make a mistake with the team composition, then a larger budget allows you to correct these mistakes faster and rearrange the composition, buy new players," said Milovs.
"They would have only received 40% from Emerson's transfer"
"It's true that Emerson left RFS for free," the club president confirmed. "There were several circumstances. Let's start with the fact that I also think it's time for him to try himself at a different level. Why didn't we try to make money with a transfer?
We had an offer from Denmark last August, I think for 900 thousand euros, almost a million. But at that time Ilich left, and we were fighting for the title at that time, and we were sure - if we let both of them go, we wouldn't win."
"In the winter, we started negotiations about extending the contract, but by then he wasn't that interested anymore, because he already knew - if the contract was ending soon, he could already think about the next club. We could have interested him with more money and extended the contract. But there was a circumstance that we would only own 40% of the total amount from his transfer anyway. We calculated that this investment would end up being similar to what we could get from the transfer, and we decided that we would use Emerson this season. But he got injured, and that didn't work out for us either. There were many factors, but the main thing was that we would only get 40% of his transfer. If we sold him for a million, we would have 400 thousand left," Milovs explained.
"As far as I know, he will go to Japan. Some might say that this is not a super level, but, in my opinion, it is high enough, and with very good financial conditions. I don't know the exact numbers, but as far as I know, this contract will allow him to secure his future."
"Ikaunieks doesn't distinguish between big and small games, and that's an important thing"
"I hope that Ikaunieks will not leave this winter," continued the RFS president. "That is my selfish opinion. Would it be better for the Latvian national team if he were a player in a higher-level league? Yes, provided that he really plays there. If he ends up in a higher-level club where he is not allowed to play, then it will hardly be good for the national team. Meanwhile, with RFS this season, he had, it seems, about 20 really high-level games, in which there was intrigue, level, etc. For example, in the foreign teams where Ikaunieks was before, he did not have so many such games."
"I want to emphasize, so that there is no misunderstanding - my hope that Ikaunieks will not leave is really from the standpoint of our club, and not about Ikaunieks' career personally," said Milovs. "We have already been left without Marhijev, Emerson in the offseason... we would not want to lose another such important player at all. Yes, we will still have the core of the squad, but Jānis does not distinguish between big and small games, and this is an important and special thing. Many other players, however, have such a classification, albeit unconsciously, but Jānis is almost equally disposed towards all opponents, including against the 1st league teams in the Latvian Cup."